Hello Everyone,

I've brought up this point before in many past posts, but I want to write a post to focus on it. If Kung Fu San Soo is supposed to be an effective form of self-defense/fighting then why do Kung Fu San Soo guys (teachers and black belts) take things from other fighting styles (like the ones recommended on this blog) and combine it with Kung Fu San Soo??? Examples being Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Muay Thai, Boxing, etc. Most importantly, the teachers of the fighting styles recommended on this blog DO NOT and WOULD NOT take anything from Kung Fu San Soo and add it to their real fighting style.

Think about this: The horse and carriage was a main form of transportation in the old days of America, but nowadays with automobiles do we add the horse OR parts of the carriage to the automobile so it can be a better automobile? Of course not. The mind of a practitioner (especially a San Soo teacher) of Kung Fu San Soo who comes to this blog and makes personal insults towards me, completely ignores the points of this blog, and can't provide arguments against the fighting styles I recommend as REAL fighting styles can't be trusted to teach effective self-defense.

Any Kung Fu San Soo practitioner who thinks Muay Thai, BJJ, Sambo, Muay Lao, etc is somehow held back as an effective, efficient, and practical fighting styles because non-resistant matches are held with rules and most importantly, any Kung Fu San Soo guy (teacher or student) who believes it has an advantage over the fighting styles recommended on this blog because Kung Fu San Soo teaches to fight without rules when
a serious encounter occurs really hasn't experienced REAL fight training and is living in a Hollywood type film.

Questions or Comments?

JimmyHWoo2016@gmail.com

Recommended Fighting Styles:

Muay Thai, Muay Lao, Pradal Serey, Lethwei, Tomoi

Sanda (San Shou, San Da), Kyuk Too Ki, Shoot Boxing, Yaw Yan

Dutch Kickboxing, Savate, Western Boxing

Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Wrestling, Sambo, Pankration, Judo, Shuai Jiao, Kali/Arnis/Escrima